|
| |  Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:26 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:21 PM
|
| The score hardly represents the true beat down. Indy got a garbage time TD. How about Manning, Harrison, and the defense? Looking pretty weak.
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson
|
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:45 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, October 31, 2008 9:14 AM
|
| Rashean27Mathis (10/28/2008)
The score hardly represents the true beat down. Indy got a garbage time TD. How about Manning, Harrison, and the defense? Looking pretty weak.It was a pretty good beating, Not as bad as last week in GB. | Score Ind: 21 Ten: 31 | | First downs Ind: 19 Ten: 23 | | Total Net Yards Ind: 317 Ten: 281 | | Rushes-yards Ind: 22-94 Ten: 31-88 | | Passing Ind: 223 Ten: 193 | | Punt Returns Ind: 1-5 Ten: 1-0 | | Kickoff Returns Ind: 6-150 Ten: 2-77 | | Interceptions Ret. Ind: 0-0 Ten: 2-40 | | Comp-Att-Int Ind: 26-41-2 Ten: 24-37-0 | | Sacked-Yards Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 0-0 | | Punts Ind: 3-37.0 Ten: 2-54.0 | | Fumbles-Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 1-0 | | Penalties-Yards Ind: 5-35 Ten: 4-40 | | Time of Possession Ind: 25:46 Ten: 34:14 |
Sam
| Don't play dumb with me, You can't win. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:52 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:33 PM
|
| I watched the first half, and first drive of 2nd half. Indy looked pretty good to me. They ran the ball and stopped the run. 14-6 half lead.
"I never set out to hurt anyone intentionally, unless it was you know, important, like in a game or something"
-Butkus"Behind every good man is a good woman. Behind every good woman....is me" |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:04 AM | |
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, October 31, 2008 9:14 AM
|
| JacksJags (10/28/2008)
I watched the first half, and first drive of 2nd half. Indy looked pretty good to me. They ran the ball and stopped the run. 14-6 half lead.What really impressed me JJ was the OL of the Titans. It looked like Collins was sitting behind a brick wall .. Was he ever under any pressure at all? It sure didn't seem like it. The Colts OL did pretty good. Finally they were healthy enough to play the OL they were expecting to from the start, And the difference showed against a very good defense. The Jags wont be totally healthy up front this year, And I think some of those defenses (After the next two games) are going to cause them problems. I don't see the Colts climbing out of the hole they are in, The Jags have a shot, But the OL will have to play better. Sam
| Don't play dumb with me, You can't win. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:37 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:32 PM
|
| | |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:55 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 11:30 AM
|
| Sammy (10/28/2008)
Rashean27Mathis (10/28/2008)
The score hardly represents the true beat down. Indy got a garbage time TD. How about Manning, Harrison, and the defense? Looking pretty weak.It was a pretty good beating, Not as bad as last week in GB. | Score Ind: 21 Ten: 31 | | First downs Ind: 19 Ten: 23 | | Total Net Yards Ind: 317 Ten: 281 | | Rushes-yards Ind: 22-94 Ten: 31-88 | | Passing Ind: 223 Ten: 193 | | Punt Returns Ind: 1-5 Ten: 1-0 | | Kickoff Returns Ind: 6-150 Ten: 2-77 | | Interceptions Ret. Ind: 0-0 Ten: 2-40 | | Comp-Att-Int Ind: 26-41-2 Ten: 24-37-0 | | Sacked-Yards Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 0-0 | | Punts Ind: 3-37.0 Ten: 2-54.0 | | Fumbles-Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 1-0 | | Penalties-Yards Ind: 5-35 Ten: 4-40 | | Time of Possession Ind: 25:46 Ten: 34:14 |
Sam Sammy sorry to disagree but the numbers you forgot are quite important. GB got 14 points from their D TO. The tacks got two picks but they scored at will in the second half. They broke indy down badly. They showed that indy could slow TN with putting 4 DL and 4 LB on the field for a period of time but it also showed anyone who thinks the tacks cant come back on them is sadly mistaken. Lots of questions got answered for me last night. I bet GB loses next week. I see TN being able to run it and I see GB struggling to score many points. TN D is that good.
| Why the name TitanJag? I am a Jag fan who has a sister married to a now former Titan player. Thank god he left in Free Agency. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 6:54 PM | |
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, October 31, 2008 9:14 AM
|
| Titanjag (10/28/2008)
Sammy (10/28/2008)
Rashean27Mathis (10/28/2008)
The score hardly represents the true beat down. Indy got a garbage time TD. How about Manning, Harrison, and the defense? Looking pretty weak.It was a pretty good beating, Not as bad as last week in GB. | Score Ind: 21 Ten: 31 | | First downs Ind: 19 Ten: 23 | | Total Net Yards Ind: 317 Ten: 281 | | Rushes-yards Ind: 22-94 Ten: 31-88 | | Passing Ind: 223 Ten: 193 | | Punt Returns Ind: 1-5 Ten: 1-0 | | Kickoff Returns Ind: 6-150 Ten: 2-77 | | Interceptions Ret. Ind: 0-0 Ten: 2-40 | | Comp-Att-Int Ind: 26-41-2 Ten: 24-37-0 | | Sacked-Yards Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 0-0 | | Punts Ind: 3-37.0 Ten: 2-54.0 | | Fumbles-Lost Ind: 0-0 Ten: 1-0 | | Penalties-Yards Ind: 5-35 Ten: 4-40 | | Time of Possession Ind: 25:46 Ten: 34:14 |
Sam Sammy sorry to disagree but the numbers you forgot are quite important. GB got 14 points from their D TO. The tacks got two picks but they scored at will in the second half. They broke indy down badly. They showed that indy could slow TN with putting 4 DL and 4 LB on the field for a period of time but it also showed anyone who thinks the tacks cant come back on them is sadly mistaken. Lots of questions got answered for me last night. I bet GB loses next week. I see TN being able to run it and I see GB struggling to score many points. TN D is that good. I don't mind you disagreeing. I thought the Colts could have been in the Titans game had (A) Don't lose the turnover battle, And (B) No stupid mistakes. In both the GB & Titans game they did both, Maybe more so in the GB game. I may be wrong, But it sure seemed like GB moved the ball with better efficiency than the Titans. Nothing against the Titans at all, They are a beast to deal with, And I don't see that ending any time soon. They are good, And the Colts would have to play their best and most efficient game to beat them. It didn't happen. Tell you what, Just for bragging rights .. I will take GB straight up (Not sure what the spread will be), Not because I think they are better than the Titans, Just because I have never gotten a bet on the board although I have tried several sig bets .. Seems no one wants to change my sig. Go figure.  We can call it the "I was right bet".  Deal?  Sam
| Don't play dumb with me, You can't win. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:49 PM | |
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 11:30 AM
|
| ok.
| Why the name TitanJag? I am a Jag fan who has a sister married to a now former Titan player. Thank god he left in Free Agency. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:56 PM | |
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, October 31, 2008 9:14 AM
|
| Titanjag (10/28/2008)
ok.Alright, Finally! I tried to bet Sage last year .. I was willing to take the Giants in the SB straight up .. No deal from him, And I was far from confident, I was sure I would lose. I sure hope this doesn't set me back in my gambling addiction recovery.  Hey, Where the heck is Sage? Remember him? Good guy. Sam
| Don't play dumb with me, You can't win. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:16 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:24 AM
|
| Colts wasn't exposed at nothing...
|
| |
|
|