Would You Trade For Larry Johnson - Rb - Chiefs This Offseason?
 
jaguars.com Message Board
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


12»»

Would You Trade For Larry Johnson - Rb -...Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Monday, October 13, 2008 8:58 AM


Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:43 PM

CHIEFS SHOPPING L.J., TOO

At a time when the Chiefs are actively talking to other teams about a trade of tight end Tony Gonzalez, Jay Glazer of FOX reports that they also are shopping running back Larry Johnson.

It’d be a wise move to move L.J., as we pointed out in last week’s Ten-Pack for SportingNews.com.  Really, who needs a high-end running back when the team is routinely going to be abandoning the run?

The problem is that the Chiefs will have a hard time finding someone to assume Johnson’s contract, and his reputation for surliness.  (The other problem is that, barring a catastrophic injury on Sunday, no contending team needs a tailback of L.J.’s ilk.  Except for maybe the Broncos, but the Chiefs would likely resist trading Johnson within the division.)

Johnson is signed for four more seasons, with base salaries of $2.5 million in 2008, $4.55 million in 2009, $5 million in 2010, $5.3 million in 2011, and $5.9 million in 2012.

Assuming that the Chiefs decide to trade Larry Johnson this offseason, would you advocate trading a 2009 Rd 3 pick to make this trade? Sure Fred is still healthy, but a Larry Johnson and MoJo running combo would be awesome. Looks like his contract is not much different than Fred's.

Post #645987
Posted Monday, October 13, 2008 9:41 AM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:22 PM
No way. Draft a back.



Future Jaguars: Boo Robinson, Bear Pascoe
Post #646030
Posted Monday, October 13, 2008 11:15 AM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:10 AM
Jags2DaDeath (10/13/2008)
No way. Drafta back.




Not in a million years would I trade for LJ.




"You cannot build character, in my opinion, except through adversity"
-Bobby Bowden

"We will stop the run"
-JDR
Post #646116
Posted Monday, October 13, 2008 11:42 AM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:15 PM
Stigma (10/13/2008)

CHIEFS SHOPPING L.J., TOO

At a time when the Chiefs are actively talking to other teams about a trade of tight end Tony Gonzalez, Jay Glazer of FOX reports that they also are shopping running back Larry Johnson.

It’d be a wise move to move L.J., as we pointed out in last week’s Ten-Pack for SportingNews.com.  Really, who needs a high-end running back when the team is routinely going to be abandoning the run?

The problem is that the Chiefs will have a hard time finding someone to assume Johnson’s contract, and his reputation for surliness.  (The other problem is that, barring a catastrophic injury on Sunday, no contending team needs a tailback of L.J.’s ilk.  Except for maybe the Broncos, but the Chiefs would likely resist trading Johnson within the division.)

Johnson is signed for four more seasons, with base salaries of $2.5 million in 2008, $4.55 million in 2009, $5 million in 2010, $5.3 million in 2011, and $5.9 million in 2012.

Assuming that the Chiefs decide to trade Larry Johnson this offseason, would you advocate trading a 2009 Rd 3 pick to make this trade? Sure Fred is still healthy, but a Larry Johnson and MoJo running combo would be awesome. Looks like his contract is not much different than Fred's.

For a 3rd? Absolutely. But LJ is a line-dependant back. It's different from an average back behind a good line because LJ will manipulate his line (patiently running behind them, then pushing them into the way to create holes). I think he would do great if he could put even more power behind his running.




Jagwired'd is to moderators as a wrongfully accused killer is to the court of law.

I show off my anger after Jags losses. I can't help myself.

Post #646146
Posted Monday, October 13, 2008 1:29 PM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 07, 2009 9:51 AM
I don't think that he would do well here at all.

He is a guy that needs to be coddled, and loved, and be the center of attention for the Offense or he goes all 'surly' on you and quits. I don't think that he would operate very well in a two-back system where he is just another option.

Pass.




Go heavy early.


You do not maintain perfection, you work for it everyday.


Post #646268
Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:49 PM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 07, 2009 9:51 AM
Let me reiterate my previous suggestion.

Pass.




Go heavy early.


You do not maintain perfection, you work for it everyday.


Post #647971
Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:31 PM


Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, February 02, 2009 4:50 PM
Nope. He's a good RB that needs a great OL to be successful. Plus he's a me-first player that would hate being part of a RB stable.
Post #648016
Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:19 PM


Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 11:16 PM
get rid of fred? you burn in hell!
Post #648059
Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:55 PM




Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:10 PM
Absolutely not. Not only does he have alot of miles on him, and a prima donna in the locker room, he has off the field issues too. Along with a big contract and his drop in productivity, the chiefs are married at the hip with LJ



BASE_D


Jags MB resident statistician/researcher

Post #648448
Posted Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:08 AM


Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 01, 2009 6:18 AM
He was worked so hard he broke down. Draft a young back if you need a replacement for Fred.



Kiwi Jag fan
Post #648737
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

12»»

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 3:35am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2009
Execution: 0.250. 7 queries. Compression Enabled.