|
| |  Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:49 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:23 PM
|
| declinometer (5/13/2008)
40 (5/13/2008)
Declineometer, so I should officially abort any attempt to dialogue with you on this? Are you purposely avoiding my questions? I'm not being negative, just asking you to clarify your position.1. I read one question in what you wrote. I think. Before last season, there were many questions regarding RW progression. To deny that means that you are a new Jaguar fan or just don't pay attention. 2. That was brought up in a list of items that COULD be a hindrance to Matts development from college QB to NFL receiver.
Was that the question you wanted answered. Please answer before Cunningham jumps in. 1. Are you being serious? My first post to you consists of multiple questions. 2. You didn't phrase that as something that could be a hindrance. Furthermore, what RW does has no bearing on MJ. If MJ plays better, MJ gets the nod and based on past experience MJ was given every opportunity to maintain a starting position. My valid take MJ hasn't improved since his 4 TDs last year is less than his season high of 5. Furthermore, RW too had to deal with a QB controversy and yet he managed to explode last year. In comparison, MJ hasn't progressed. When RW was benched he worked harder. When MJ was benched we heard requests for a trade. Here is my first post. I have highlighted the multiple questions. So if I have taken a hit during a football game I am allowed a higher level of credibility? OK. Since I have many memories of being blind sided by a blocking fullback or TE let me add to this discussion. Your insistance that MJ was our 2nd leading TD WR is false as he was tied for that honor with DN. I'm still not sure why you fail to validate MJ's demotion by JDR. Is that agenda driven or production driven? It is well documented that RW works harder than MJ and that work paid off in RW having a fine season w\10 TDs and playing in every game save week 1.Your argument, the "wait and see" argument, is fine and fair, however by offering up the roster spot you take it away from someone else. If my option is to sign a DE or DT or OT that has potential and that means cutting someone who do I look to? The player that underperforms and lacks a respected work ethic. Coaches note it, players note it and yet you would have the team continue to work with "Jesus Jones" in order to maximize that potential. What an utterly ridiculous and counter-productive position to take from, at the very least, a business stand point. I pay to be entertained by this team, and hence my money is a component of his salary. If he isn't performing I don't want my dollars in his pocket. As a human being I would love for this kid to show what we all hoped he would. Lastly, regarding you're "Leftwich\Garrard" argument, why is it that you weren't willing to allow more time for Byron to develop? Why is this patience only justified for MJ?
- The world of the happy is quite different from the world of the unhappy.
-
- Ludwig Wittgenstein
|
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:25 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:18 PM
|
| | |
| | | Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:41 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:45 AM
|
| | Bump again Come on de-clan let's see the large brain that you keep under your whitesheet.
"I wake up in the morning and piss excellence!"
Ricky Bobby |
|
| |
| | | Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:18 PM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, August 11, 2008 7:21 PM
|
| cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
jtmoney (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
Gabe (5/12/2008)
40 (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
JacksJags (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
As much as I think Matt Jones is a punk and just doesnt care, it is in his best interest this year to step up. He is in his contract year, and unless he has an amazing year he will have trouble latching onto anyone next year for more than the league minimum. I have a feeling he will have some renewed energy when the threat of some of those 0's gets taken away.What a Jaguar fan. "I want Matt to care more.....and he's a punk". No wonder our team gets no respect around the league. I promise you there is no bigger Jag fan than me and I don't think it is wrong at all to be upset at any one player. Do you disagree that Jones has not played up to his potential, his athletic potential? He has been horrible. He appears to be lazy and really not care. Do you think me saying that makes him play worse? Does he play that way because some people think that? Absolutely not. Again Jack, Matt's play has not been horrible. He was second on the team last year in TD receptions. Can he play better? Of course he can. Can Mathis, Barnes, Podlesh, Nelson, Williams, Northcutt play better? I hope so !!! This dump on Matt thing has taken on a life of it's own. It's the vogue thing for fans that have never taken a hit in a football game to do. For some reason Lagaman has a hard on for Matt and the robot fans have bought it. Just like they bought it when Lagaman said that L:eftwich was leaps and bounds better than Garrard. The nuts bought it and looked foolish in doing so. So if I have taken a hit during a football game I am allowed a higher level of credibility? OK. Since I have many memories of being blind sided by a blocking fullback or TE let me add to this discussion. Your insistance that MJ was our 2nd leading TD WR is false as he was tied for that honor with DN. I'm still not sure why you fail to validate MJ's demotion by JDR. Is that agenda driven or production driven? It is well documented that RW works harder than MJ and that work paid off in RW having a fine season w\10 TDs and playing in every game save week 1. Your argument, the "wait and see" argument, if fine and fair however by offering up the roster spot you take it away from someone else. If my option is to sign a DE or DT or OT that has potential and that means cutting someone who do I look to? The player that underperforms and lacks a respected work ethic. Coaches note it, players note it and yet you would have the team continue to work with "Jesus Jones" in order to maximize that potential. What an utterly ridiculous and counter-productive position to take from, at the very least, a business stand point. I pay to be entertained by this team, and hence my money is a component of his salary. If he isn't performing I don't want my dollars in his pocket. As a human being I would love for this kid to show what we all hoped he would. Lastly, regarding you're "Leftwich\Garrard" argument, why is it that you weren't willing to allow more time for Byron to develop? Why is this patience only justified for MJ? This is a great response. Man, a guy goes to lunch and someone else puts Declino in his place better than I did....nice post. Jones has done very well with his transition from college QB to NFL receiver. He has progressed despite a QB controversy and even a receiver controversy. When is Reggie going to show improvement, who will be the #1 Reggie or EW, and a new TE. Matt has plodded through all of this while learning his craft and contributing. Now is not the time to get rid of Matt. Now is the time enjoy the fruits of the Jaguar's labor. I don't see how hating on Matt in the off season is very productive. Let him give you a reason to flame and then and only then you can kick and scream like a 4 year old with the childish name calling. Quite possibly the most ignorant response I have ever seen on this message board. Congrats! Let him give me a reason to hate on him? Have you not seen him play the last 3 years? How many more years do we give him on the "learning curve"? By the time his learning curve runs out he will be 31 and on the downside of his athletic ability. Thats all he has right now, and he isnt using that very well at this point. Matt had a slight connection with Byron Leftwich and doesnt appear to be on the go to receiver for David Garrard. The connection just doesnt seem to be there. Maybe if David Garrard had some confidence in him he would get more passes thrown to him. Oh yeah, the whole play time thing. Maybe if he didnt get BENCHED for 4 games more would have come? Hypocrite. Can't post a response without calling names. Thanks for making my point. IT'S WHAT YOU DO !! I get it now. Your right...there is no evidence on this board of you calling a Jaguar names...... Hypocrite Declinometer, being called a hypocrite isn't name calling. Stop being so sensitive. Matt Jones has 1,392 yards in his 3 year career and averages 31 yards a game over that time. He has a career total of 13 TD's. Last year he regressed in what was the Jaguars most potent offense in our teams history. Reggie Williams has 1,958 yards and averages 31 yards a game over that same time. Pretty comparable. Also he has 15 td's. The main difference is that he has gotten better every year. In 2004 he had 268 yards and 1 TD. In 2005 he had 445 yards and 0 TD's. In 2006 he had 616 yards and 4 TD's averaging 11.8 per catch. In 2008 he had 629 yards and 10 TD's averaging 16.6 yards a catch. Matt Jones on the other hand went from 643 yards in 2006 with an average of 15.7 per catch to 2007 having only 317 yards and averaging only 13.2 a catch. I don't know how you can say Reggie hasn't gotten better (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he has done) and that Matt Jones has (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he hasn't done). Matt regressed last year and was bench do to not practicing hard. Reggie has always had a great work ethic and on top of that he is probably one of the top 3 blocking WR's in the league. He doesn't take plays off. Declinometer, I just don't see how you can back up what you are saying. If you are going to say Matt has gotten better then at least provide something to show that he has. Listen, I'm all ears to hear what you have to say, just provide something of value instead of "Matt is the best we need to keep him, he has improved, etc...". Declino, how much longer should we give Matt to improve? If he doesnt improve over the next year, how many more years should the Jaguars give him, keeping in mind that he will get a new deal after next year.... Nice Pyramid, fellas.
Those Who Stay Will Be Champions |
|
| |
| | | Posted Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:44 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, November 21, 2008 1:46 PM
|
| maize n blue (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
jtmoney (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
Gabe (5/12/2008)
40 (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
JacksJags (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
As much as I think Matt Jones is a punk and just doesnt care, it is in his best interest this year to step up. He is in his contract year, and unless he has an amazing year he will have trouble latching onto anyone next year for more than the league minimum. I have a feeling he will have some renewed energy when the threat of some of those 0's gets taken away.What a Jaguar fan. "I want Matt to care more.....and he's a punk". No wonder our team gets no respect around the league. I promise you there is no bigger Jag fan than me and I don't think it is wrong at all to be upset at any one player. Do you disagree that Jones has not played up to his potential, his athletic potential? He has been horrible. He appears to be lazy and really not care. Do you think me saying that makes him play worse? Does he play that way because some people think that? Absolutely not. Again Jack, Matt's play has not been horrible. He was second on the team last year in TD receptions. Can he play better? Of course he can. Can Mathis, Barnes, Podlesh, Nelson, Williams, Northcutt play better? I hope so !!! This dump on Matt thing has taken on a life of it's own. It's the vogue thing for fans that have never taken a hit in a football game to do. For some reason Lagaman has a hard on for Matt and the robot fans have bought it. Just like they bought it when Lagaman said that L:eftwich was leaps and bounds better than Garrard. The nuts bought it and looked foolish in doing so. So if I have taken a hit during a football game I am allowed a higher level of credibility? OK. Since I have many memories of being blind sided by a blocking fullback or TE let me add to this discussion. Your insistance that MJ was our 2nd leading TD WR is false as he was tied for that honor with DN. I'm still not sure why you fail to validate MJ's demotion by JDR. Is that agenda driven or production driven? It is well documented that RW works harder than MJ and that work paid off in RW having a fine season w\10 TDs and playing in every game save week 1. Your argument, the "wait and see" argument, if fine and fair however by offering up the roster spot you take it away from someone else. If my option is to sign a DE or DT or OT that has potential and that means cutting someone who do I look to? The player that underperforms and lacks a respected work ethic. Coaches note it, players note it and yet you would have the team continue to work with "Jesus Jones" in order to maximize that potential. What an utterly ridiculous and counter-productive position to take from, at the very least, a business stand point. I pay to be entertained by this team, and hence my money is a component of his salary. If he isn't performing I don't want my dollars in his pocket. As a human being I would love for this kid to show what we all hoped he would. Lastly, regarding you're "Leftwich\Garrard" argument, why is it that you weren't willing to allow more time for Byron to develop? Why is this patience only justified for MJ? This is a great response. Man, a guy goes to lunch and someone else puts Declino in his place better than I did....nice post. Jones has done very well with his transition from college QB to NFL receiver. He has progressed despite a QB controversy and even a receiver controversy. When is Reggie going to show improvement, who will be the #1 Reggie or EW, and a new TE. Matt has plodded through all of this while learning his craft and contributing. Now is not the time to get rid of Matt. Now is the time enjoy the fruits of the Jaguar's labor. I don't see how hating on Matt in the off season is very productive. Let him give you a reason to flame and then and only then you can kick and scream like a 4 year old with the childish name calling. Quite possibly the most ignorant response I have ever seen on this message board. Congrats! Let him give me a reason to hate on him? Have you not seen him play the last 3 years? How many more years do we give him on the "learning curve"? By the time his learning curve runs out he will be 31 and on the downside of his athletic ability. Thats all he has right now, and he isnt using that very well at this point. Matt had a slight connection with Byron Leftwich and doesnt appear to be on the go to receiver for David Garrard. The connection just doesnt seem to be there. Maybe if David Garrard had some confidence in him he would get more passes thrown to him. Oh yeah, the whole play time thing. Maybe if he didnt get BENCHED for 4 games more would have come? Hypocrite. Can't post a response without calling names. Thanks for making my point. IT'S WHAT YOU DO !! I get it now. Your right...there is no evidence on this board of you calling a Jaguar names...... Hypocrite Declinometer, being called a hypocrite isn't name calling. Stop being so sensitive. Matt Jones has 1,392 yards in his 3 year career and averages 31 yards a game over that time. He has a career total of 13 TD's. Last year he regressed in what was the Jaguars most potent offense in our teams history. Reggie Williams has 1,958 yards and averages 31 yards a game over that same time. Pretty comparable. Also he has 15 td's. The main difference is that he has gotten better every year. In 2004 he had 268 yards and 1 TD. In 2005 he had 445 yards and 0 TD's. In 2006 he had 616 yards and 4 TD's averaging 11.8 per catch. In 2008 he had 629 yards and 10 TD's averaging 16.6 yards a catch. Matt Jones on the other hand went from 643 yards in 2006 with an average of 15.7 per catch to 2007 having only 317 yards and averaging only 13.2 a catch. I don't know how you can say Reggie hasn't gotten better (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he has done) and that Matt Jones has (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he hasn't done). Matt regressed last year and was bench do to not practicing hard. Reggie has always had a great work ethic and on top of that he is probably one of the top 3 blocking WR's in the league. He doesn't take plays off. Declinometer, I just don't see how you can back up what you are saying. If you are going to say Matt has gotten better then at least provide something to show that he has. Listen, I'm all ears to hear what you have to say, just provide something of value instead of "Matt is the best we need to keep him, he has improved, etc...". Declino, how much longer should we give Matt to improve? If he doesnt improve over the next year, how many more years should the Jaguars give him, keeping in mind that he will get a new deal after next year.... Nice Pyramid, fellas. Bump...one more brick to that pyramid
Either write something worth reading, or do something worth writing.
|
|
| |
| | | Posted Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:13 AM | |
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, August 11, 2008 7:21 PM
|
| Gabe (5/14/2008)
maize n blue (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
jtmoney (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
Gabe (5/12/2008)
40 (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
JacksJags (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
As much as I think Matt Jones is a punk and just doesnt care, it is in his best interest this year to step up. He is in his contract year, and unless he has an amazing year he will have trouble latching onto anyone next year for more than the league minimum. I have a feeling he will have some renewed energy when the threat of some of those 0's gets taken away.What a Jaguar fan. "I want Matt to care more.....and he's a punk". No wonder our team gets no respect around the league. I promise you there is no bigger Jag fan than me and I don't think it is wrong at all to be upset at any one player. Do you disagree that Jones has not played up to his potential, his athletic potential? He has been horrible. He appears to be lazy and really not care. Do you think me saying that makes him play worse? Does he play that way because some people think that? Absolutely not. Again Jack, Matt's play has not been horrible. He was second on the team last year in TD receptions. Can he play better? Of course he can. Can Mathis, Barnes, Podlesh, Nelson, Williams, Northcutt play better? I hope so !!! This dump on Matt thing has taken on a life of it's own. It's the vogue thing for fans that have never taken a hit in a football game to do. For some reason Lagaman has a hard on for Matt and the robot fans have bought it. Just like they bought it when Lagaman said that L:eftwich was leaps and bounds better than Garrard. The nuts bought it and looked foolish in doing so. So if I have taken a hit during a football game I am allowed a higher level of credibility? OK. Since I have many memories of being blind sided by a blocking fullback or TE let me add to this discussion. Your insistance that MJ was our 2nd leading TD WR is false as he was tied for that honor with DN. I'm still not sure why you fail to validate MJ's demotion by JDR. Is that agenda driven or production driven? It is well documented that RW works harder than MJ and that work paid off in RW having a fine season w\10 TDs and playing in every game save week 1. Your argument, the "wait and see" argument, if fine and fair however by offering up the roster spot you take it away from someone else. If my option is to sign a DE or DT or OT that has potential and that means cutting someone who do I look to? The player that underperforms and lacks a respected work ethic. Coaches note it, players note it and yet you would have the team continue to work with "Jesus Jones" in order to maximize that potential. What an utterly ridiculous and counter-productive position to take from, at the very least, a business stand point. I pay to be entertained by this team, and hence my money is a component of his salary. If he isn't performing I don't want my dollars in his pocket. As a human being I would love for this kid to show what we all hoped he would. Lastly, regarding you're "Leftwich\Garrard" argument, why is it that you weren't willing to allow more time for Byron to develop? Why is this patience only justified for MJ? This is a great response. Man, a guy goes to lunch and someone else puts Declino in his place better than I did....nice post. Jones has done very well with his transition from college QB to NFL receiver. He has progressed despite a QB controversy and even a receiver controversy. When is Reggie going to show improvement, who will be the #1 Reggie or EW, and a new TE. Matt has plodded through all of this while learning his craft and contributing. Now is not the time to get rid of Matt. Now is the time enjoy the fruits of the Jaguar's labor. I don't see how hating on Matt in the off season is very productive. Let him give you a reason to flame and then and only then you can kick and scream like a 4 year old with the childish name calling. Quite possibly the most ignorant response I have ever seen on this message board. Congrats! Let him give me a reason to hate on him? Have you not seen him play the last 3 years? How many more years do we give him on the "learning curve"? By the time his learning curve runs out he will be 31 and on the downside of his athletic ability. Thats all he has right now, and he isnt using that very well at this point. Matt had a slight connection with Byron Leftwich and doesnt appear to be on the go to receiver for David Garrard. The connection just doesnt seem to be there. Maybe if David Garrard had some confidence in him he would get more passes thrown to him. Oh yeah, the whole play time thing. Maybe if he didnt get BENCHED for 4 games more would have come? Hypocrite. Can't post a response without calling names. Thanks for making my point. IT'S WHAT YOU DO !! I get it now. Your right...there is no evidence on this board of you calling a Jaguar names...... Hypocrite Declinometer, being called a hypocrite isn't name calling. Stop being so sensitive. Matt Jones has 1,392 yards in his 3 year career and averages 31 yards a game over that time. He has a career total of 13 TD's. Last year he regressed in what was the Jaguars most potent offense in our teams history. Reggie Williams has 1,958 yards and averages 31 yards a game over that same time. Pretty comparable. Also he has 15 td's. The main difference is that he has gotten better every year. In 2004 he had 268 yards and 1 TD. In 2005 he had 445 yards and 0 TD's. In 2006 he had 616 yards and 4 TD's averaging 11.8 per catch. In 2008 he had 629 yards and 10 TD's averaging 16.6 yards a catch. Matt Jones on the other hand went from 643 yards in 2006 with an average of 15.7 per catch to 2007 having only 317 yards and averaging only 13.2 a catch. I don't know how you can say Reggie hasn't gotten better (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he has done) and that Matt Jones has (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he hasn't done). Matt regressed last year and was bench do to not practicing hard. Reggie has always had a great work ethic and on top of that he is probably one of the top 3 blocking WR's in the league. He doesn't take plays off. Declinometer, I just don't see how you can back up what you are saying. If you are going to say Matt has gotten better then at least provide something to show that he has. Listen, I'm all ears to hear what you have to say, just provide something of value instead of "Matt is the best we need to keep him, he has improved, etc...". Declino, how much longer should we give Matt to improve? If he doesnt improve over the next year, how many more years should the Jaguars give him, keeping in mind that he will get a new deal after next year.... Nice Pyramid, fellas. Bump...one more brick to that pyramid Bump...just for giggles.
Those Who Stay Will Be Champions |
|
| |
| | | Posted Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:17 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:26 PM
|
| maize n blue (5/14/2008)
Gabe (5/14/2008)
maize n blue (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
jtmoney (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/13/2008)
declinometer (5/13/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
Gabe (5/12/2008)
40 (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
JacksJags (5/12/2008)
declinometer (5/12/2008)
cunninghamj (5/12/2008)
As much as I think Matt Jones is a punk and just doesnt care, it is in his best interest this year to step up. He is in his contract year, and unless he has an amazing year he will have trouble latching onto anyone next year for more than the league minimum. I have a feeling he will have some renewed energy when the threat of some of those 0's gets taken away.What a Jaguar fan. "I want Matt to care more.....and he's a punk". No wonder our team gets no respect around the league. I promise you there is no bigger Jag fan than me and I don't think it is wrong at all to be upset at any one player. Do you disagree that Jones has not played up to his potential, his athletic potential? He has been horrible. He appears to be lazy and really not care. Do you think me saying that makes him play worse? Does he play that way because some people think that? Absolutely not. Again Jack, Matt's play has not been horrible. He was second on the team last year in TD receptions. Can he play better? Of course he can. Can Mathis, Barnes, Podlesh, Nelson, Williams, Northcutt play better? I hope so !!! This dump on Matt thing has taken on a life of it's own. It's the vogue thing for fans that have never taken a hit in a football game to do. For some reason Lagaman has a hard on for Matt and the robot fans have bought it. Just like they bought it when Lagaman said that L:eftwich was leaps and bounds better than Garrard. The nuts bought it and looked foolish in doing so. So if I have taken a hit during a football game I am allowed a higher level of credibility? OK. Since I have many memories of being blind sided by a blocking fullback or TE let me add to this discussion. Your insistance that MJ was our 2nd leading TD WR is false as he was tied for that honor with DN. I'm still not sure why you fail to validate MJ's demotion by JDR. Is that agenda driven or production driven? It is well documented that RW works harder than MJ and that work paid off in RW having a fine season w\10 TDs and playing in every game save week 1. Your argument, the "wait and see" argument, if fine and fair however by offering up the roster spot you take it away from someone else. If my option is to sign a DE or DT or OT that has potential and that means cutting someone who do I look to? The player that underperforms and lacks a respected work ethic. Coaches note it, players note it and yet you would have the team continue to work with "Jesus Jones" in order to maximize that potential. What an utterly ridiculous and counter-productive position to take from, at the very least, a business stand point. I pay to be entertained by this team, and hence my money is a component of his salary. If he isn't performing I don't want my dollars in his pocket. As a human being I would love for this kid to show what we all hoped he would. Lastly, regarding you're "Leftwich\Garrard" argument, why is it that you weren't willing to allow more time for Byron to develop? Why is this patience only justified for MJ? This is a great response. Man, a guy goes to lunch and someone else puts Declino in his place better than I did....nice post. Jones has done very well with his transition from college QB to NFL receiver. He has progressed despite a QB controversy and even a receiver controversy. When is Reggie going to show improvement, who will be the #1 Reggie or EW, and a new TE. Matt has plodded through all of this while learning his craft and contributing. Now is not the time to get rid of Matt. Now is the time enjoy the fruits of the Jaguar's labor. I don't see how hating on Matt in the off season is very productive. Let him give you a reason to flame and then and only then you can kick and scream like a 4 year old with the childish name calling. Quite possibly the most ignorant response I have ever seen on this message board. Congrats! Let him give me a reason to hate on him? Have you not seen him play the last 3 years? How many more years do we give him on the "learning curve"? By the time his learning curve runs out he will be 31 and on the downside of his athletic ability. Thats all he has right now, and he isnt using that very well at this point. Matt had a slight connection with Byron Leftwich and doesnt appear to be on the go to receiver for David Garrard. The connection just doesnt seem to be there. Maybe if David Garrard had some confidence in him he would get more passes thrown to him. Oh yeah, the whole play time thing. Maybe if he didnt get BENCHED for 4 games more would have come? Hypocrite. Can't post a response without calling names. Thanks for making my point. IT'S WHAT YOU DO !! I get it now. Your right...there is no evidence on this board of you calling a Jaguar names...... Hypocrite Declinometer, being called a hypocrite isn't name calling. Stop being so sensitive. Matt Jones has 1,392 yards in his 3 year career and averages 31 yards a game over that time. He has a career total of 13 TD's. Last year he regressed in what was the Jaguars most potent offense in our teams history. Reggie Williams has 1,958 yards and averages 31 yards a game over that same time. Pretty comparable. Also he has 15 td's. The main difference is that he has gotten better every year. In 2004 he had 268 yards and 1 TD. In 2005 he had 445 yards and 0 TD's. In 2006 he had 616 yards and 4 TD's averaging 11.8 per catch. In 2008 he had 629 yards and 10 TD's averaging 16.6 yards a catch. Matt Jones on the other hand went from 643 yards in 2006 with an average of 15.7 per catch to 2007 having only 317 yards and averaging only 13.2 a catch. I don't know how you can say Reggie hasn't gotten better (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he has done) and that Matt Jones has (when, if you look at his stats, that's exactly what he hasn't done). Matt regressed last year and was bench do to not practicing hard. Reggie has always had a great work ethic and on top of that he is probably one of the top 3 blocking WR's in the league. He doesn't take plays off. Declinometer, I just don't see how you can back up what you are saying. If you are going to say Matt has gotten better then at least provide something to show that he has. Listen, I'm all ears to hear what you have to say, just provide something of value instead of "Matt is the best we need to keep him, he has improved, etc...". Declino, how much longer should we give Matt to improve? If he doesnt improve over the next year, how many more years should the Jaguars give him, keeping in mind that he will get a new deal after next year.... Nice Pyramid, fellas. Bump...one more brick to that pyramid Bump...just for giggles. Why are we doing this?
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|...BEER TRUCK..........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
If you're not wasted, the day is. My theme song. Make the world a better place, punch Tim Teblow and Tony Stewart Kyle Busch in the face. |
|
| |
| | | Posted Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:18 AM | |
| 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:05 PM
|
| New pyramid. Lets call it the "we hate matt jones" pyramid for our daily Matt Jones bashing. Declino should love it.
Self-praise is for losers. Be a winner. Stand for something. Always have class, and be humble.
John MaddenMember of Jaguar nation and season ticket holder since Day 1 |
|
| |
|
|