|
| | |
Last Login: Thursday, August 14, 2008 12:38 PM
|
| Kyle Brady was the starting TE for most of those years prior to his departure in 2007 (may have been 2006)
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Winston Churchill |
|
| |
| | |
Last Login: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:24 AM
|
| rfc17 (5/3/2008)
I dont really think all that much of Jackson.The jaguars couldn't have thouhgt all that much of him either because all counts were that he would have ben there at 26 or a lot closer than 8. If they really wanted Jackson they would have stayed put. I think that harvey offers more upside than Jackson.
| We will all have to make the choice between what is right, and what is easy. Give freely unto others, be brave in the face of your enemies, love those who hate you for those who hate you will only win if you hate them back, be generous with praise-it costs nothing, love all men, and fear not for he will come. There will come a day when the courage of good men will fade away and the tyranny of the weak will destroy mankind..., but today does not have to be that day! remembe this day men, for it is the curse of man that they forget... |
|
| |
| | |
Last Login: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:25 AM
|
| Okay, I don't want to get involved in the huge Wrighster argument. But here is a link I found that shows all the times he has been on the injury report since 2003. The "days out" column is pretty useless but it atleast shows the number of times he was listed.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6440/injuries.html |
| |
| | | 
Last Login: Today @ 1:03 AM
|
| jagabc6893 (5/5/2008)
BJORN TOURAQUE (5/4/2008)
jagabc6893 (5/4/2008)
BJORN TOURAQUE (5/4/2008)
Again, based on what? That he's not Tony Gonzalez? Based on something proven and better that we have?
What am I missing here? In this thread he's been called "aging" at 27 and a "medical reject" with two career injures and it's been said that there are others with equal production on this team.
I see no basis for any of these claims. And he got a 5 year extension in 2006. His chronic injuries and lack of production remind me of Byron, Stroud and Naeole (though older) to a certain extent. All of those mentioned have been released or traded. That is why I think he and Mike P both will be gone soon. Maybe not this year, but by next year. How many years with serious injuries qualifies a guy as "injury prone" in your book? 2 out of the last 3 would do it for me. And I believe he had a less serious "nagging" injury the other year. Wrighster is pretty good when he is on the field, but he has not done much the last 3 years and now has a bad knee injury. IMO, If you can see why some people think he may be replaced, then you don't pay enough attention to the team. OK, mini-mad dog, I was trying to be polite. Seeing as you're such the expert on the team I haven't been paying attention to, it's your turn to put up or shut up. What is this mystery injury that you are referring to? What exactly is this "chronic" "nagging" injury? Name it or shut it up. And lack of production. You're a funny one. Last year Marcedes Lewis was ranked 14th for TEs with his 37 catches for 391 yards and 2 TD's in 18 games in the almighty fantasy football rankings. http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/playerrankings/regularseason/TEIn 2006 Wrighster had 39 catches for 353 yards and 3 TD's in 16 games. Should we cut Lewis for his lack of production too? Lewis had an injury his rookie year. He must be "injury prone" too, huh? That's one "serious" "nagging" injury every 2 years by your math. 2 of the last three years he's had "serious injures" has he? OK, smart man, how does starting in 16 games in 2005 and 16 games in 2006 equal "serious injury" in 2 of the last three years? Does a "serious injury" cause you to start all 16 games in 2 consecutive seasons. Is making up things what does it for you? IMO, if you can't do simple math to back up your BS opinions you shouldn't be posting your opinions on a messageboard. Again. You've called him "aging" at one month removed from 27 and "injury prone" with "2 serious injures" in the past 3 years that he somehow managed to play through and said he has no production. All crap. All lies. Who's not paying attention to this team, you tool? Ok, Toolsack. You want to go elementary school and start calling each other names, I can stoop to your level. So, Joe Dirt Boy, show me in the stats below where Wrighster has "started all 16 games". Here is your quote by the way: "OK, smart man, how does starting in 16 games in 2005 and 16 games in 2006 equal "serious injury" in 2 of the last three years? Does a "serious injury" cause you to start all 16 games in 2 consecutive seasons. Is making up things what does it for you?" 2007 G 11 GS 6
2006 G 16 GS 10
2005 G 16 GS 6
2004 G 4 GS 3
2003 G 15 GS 1 Hmmmm? I don't see 16 games started any place on that list. Wrong again, retardo. You don't think a torn ACL is serious? Priceless. So, now I'd like you to answer my question about how many seasons it takes in your mind for a guy to be injured before he is considered "injury prone"? Your brilliant analysis has compared Lewis being injured ONE season to Wrighster being injured for at least 3 out of 5 seasons. Yeah, that is the same thing. Not. Wrong again. Finally, I like how you cherry pick and show Wrighster's one decent season out of 5 when showing his stats. The bottom line is that Wrighster is on the decline, and he will be gone this year or next. You magically left out the most important part of all this in your retarded attempt to argue with me. Wrighster has a serious KNEE injury. Oh wait, am I wrong about that? I already predicted Stroud and Naeole would be gone before the season started. What have you done except chime in with attempts to make other posters look bad?
Why don't you lay off the weed for a while? Maybe you will see how wrong you are, and your mullet might even grow out.
BJORN LOSER got beat down here.
Good stuff.
TMD's Jags draft: as of 3/ 11/08
1)DE Calais Campbell 2) RB Ray Rice 3a) DT Frank Okam 3b) trade to Mia for DE Jason Taylor 4) C Cody Wallace 5a) CB Terrence Wheatley 5b) WR William Franklin 5c) SS Caleb Campbell
Follow this & we'll be playing in Tampa next February
|
|
| |
| | | 
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:42 PM
|
| I like Lawrence Jackson and Red Bryant, but neither fit in to what the front office wanted to do.
Jackson is more of a LDE without much pass rush upside, but would be a solid every down end. Bryant is a solid clogger in the middle as a nose tackle in the 43 that Seattle runs.
I don't think either would have really fit into what the Jaguars are trying to do here in address the pass rush. |
| |
| | | 
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
|
| jagabc6893 (5/5/2008)
BJORN TOURAQUE (5/4/2008)
jagabc6893 (5/4/2008)
BJORN TOURAQUE (5/4/2008)
Again, based on what? That he's not Tony Gonzalez? Based on something proven and better that we have?
What am I missing here? In this thread he's been called "aging" at 27 and a "medical reject" with two career injures and it's been said that there are others with equal production on this team.
I see no basis for any of these claims. And he got a 5 year extension in 2006. His chronic injuries and lack of production remind me of Byron, Stroud and Naeole (though older) to a certain extent. All of those mentioned have been released or traded. That is why I think he and Mike P both will be gone soon. Maybe not this year, but by next year. How many years with serious injuries qualifies a guy as "injury prone" in your book? 2 out of the last 3 would do it for me. And I believe he had a less serious "nagging" injury the other year. Wrighster is pretty good when he is on the field, but he has not done much the last 3 years and now has a bad knee injury. IMO, If you can see why some people think he may be replaced, then you don't pay enough attention to the team. OK, mini-mad dog, I was trying to be polite. Seeing as you're such the expert on the team I haven't been paying attention to, it's your turn to put up or shut up. What is this mystery injury that you are referring to? What exactly is this "chronic" "nagging" injury? Name it or shut it up. And lack of production. You're a funny one. Last year Marcedes Lewis was ranked 14th for TEs with his 37 catches for 391 yards and 2 TD's in 18 games in the almighty fantasy football rankings. http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/playerrankings/regularseason/TEIn 2006 Wrighster had 39 catches for 353 yards and 3 TD's in 16 games. Should we cut Lewis for his lack of production too? Lewis had an injury his rookie year. He must be "injury prone" too, huh? That's one "serious" "nagging" injury every 2 years by your math. 2 of the last three years he's had "serious injures" has he? OK, smart man, how does starting in 16 games in 2005 and 16 games in 2006 equal "serious injury" in 2 of the last three years? Does a "serious injury" cause you to start all 16 games in 2 consecutive seasons. Is making up things what does it for you? IMO, if you can't do simple math to back up your BS opinions you shouldn't be posting your opinions on a messageboard. Again. You've called him "aging" at one month removed from 27 and "injury prone" with "2 serious injures" in the past 3 years that he somehow managed to play through and said he has no production. All crap. All lies. Who's not paying attention to this team, you tool? Ok, Toolsack. You want to go elementary school and start calling each other names, I can stoop to your level. So, Joe Dirt Boy, show me in the stats below where Wrighster has "started all 16 games". Here is your quote by the way: "OK, smart man, how does starting in 16 games in 2005 and 16 games in 2006 equal "serious injury" in 2 of the last three years? Does a "serious injury" cause you to start all 16 games in 2 consecutive seasons. Is making up things what does it for you?" 2007 G 11 GS 6
2006 G 16 GS 10
2005 G 16 GS 6
2004 G 4 GS 3
2003 G 15 GS 1 Hmmmm? I don't see 16 games started any place on that list. Wrong again, retardo. You don't think a torn ACL is serious? Priceless. So, now I'd like you to answer my question about how many seasons it takes in your mind for a guy to be injured before he is considered "injury prone"? Your brilliant analysis has compared Lewis being injured ONE season to Wrighster being injured for at least 3 out of 5 seasons. Yeah, that is the same thing. Not. Wrong again. Finally, I like how you cherry pick and show Wrighster's one decent season out of 5 when showing his stats. The bottom line is that Wrighster is on the decline, and he will be gone this year or next. You magically left out the most important part of all this in your retarded attempt to argue with me. Wrighster has a serious KNEE injury. Oh wait, am I wrong about that? I already predicted Stroud and Naeole would be gone before the season started. What have you done except chime in with attempts to make other posters look bad?
Why don't you lay off the weed for a while? Maybe you will see how wrong you are, and your mullet might even grow out.
OK, numb nuts. Yeah, "started", wrong word. You got me with that. How about active on the field for the game, does that work for you? Did that change the stats? Did that qualify as an injury?
I'll slow this down for you as you don't seem to want to read.
YOU: How many years with serious injuries qualifies a guy as "injury prone" in your book? 2 out of the last 3 would do it for me. And I believe he had a less serious "nagging" injury the other year.
He hurt his knee last year. That's one. Yes? 2007, yes?
So, I'm typing slow here for you. That's one out of one year.
Me: In 2006 Wrighster had 39 catches for 353 yards and 3 TD's in 16 games.
That's 16 games in 2006. Played a full year, 16 games. That's a total of ONE injury out of TWO YEARS. Yes?
Now, read very carefully here:
2007 G 11 GS 6
2006 G 16 GS 10
2005 G 16 GS 6
You posted that. Do you see that part there where you wrote "2005 G 16"? Do you see it? That means, as you said, he played 16 games in 2005.
So, if he was injured in 2007, played 16 games in 2006 and 16 games 2005. That means he HAD ONE INJURY IN 3 YEARS. Not this lie that you keep writing "2 of the last 3".
Did you follow that? Do you need pictures? Can I tutor you in math some more?
Notice I didn't quote your whole block of numbers? Let me do that for you now:
2007 G 11 GS 6
2006 G 16 GS 10
2005 G 16 GS 6
2004 G 4 GS 3
2003 G 15 GS 1
I see 2 complete 16 game seasons and one 15 game rookie season. Mind you, this is your quote.
Please point to me where you get this nonsense:
Your brilliant analysis has compared Lewis being injured ONE season to Wrighster being injured for at least 3 out of 5 seasons.
So, captain. Where is this magical 3rd injured season come from? Why won't you tell me what this mystical injury is that you mention here:
His chronic injuries and lack of production remind me of Byron, Stroud and Naeole (though older) to a certain extent.
And, here:
And I believe he had a less serious "nagging" injury the other year.
Again, put up or shut up. I'm guessing you're going to do neither.
Finally, I like how you cherry pick and show Wrighster's one decent season out of 5 when showing his stats.
So, you have comprehension issues with what you write as well as reading?
Wrighster is pretty good when he is on the field, but he has not done much the last 3 years
You wrote, I answered. The stats I quoted were from 2006. Season before last, his last full season, the season when Lewis was injured. A better season than Lewis had last year. The same last season where Lewis "started" all 16 games. If that's "cherry picking" to you, I can't help you.
I already predicted Stroud and Naeole would be gone before the season started.
A. I don't care. It doesn't make you clairvoyant or, apparently smarter.
B. Prove it. Find me a quote.
jagabc6893 (5/5/2008)
Ok, Toolsack. You want to go elementary school and start calling each other names, I can stoop to your level.
You already did. Why cop out by calling it your "opinion":
jagabc6893 (5/4/2008)
IMO, If you can see why some people think he may be replaced, then you don't pay enough attention to the team.
What have you done except chime in with attempts to make other posters look bad?
You don't really need my help. I would have this same conversation with a Colt or a Titan fan posting his worthless opinion. In fact, this conversation was with your boyfriend the new Texans fan before you came to defend his honor. At least he was smart enough to shut his trap after he got served his.
|
| |
| | |
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
|
| BJORN TOURAQUE (5/7/2008)
In fact, this conversation was with your boyfriend the new Texans fan before you came to defend his honor. At least he was smart enough to shut his trap after he got served his.
The Mad Dog (5/5/2008)
BJORN LOSER got beat down here.
Good stuff.
I stand corrected.
|
| |
| | |
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
|
| PAJagfan27 (5/5/2008)
Okay, I don't want to get involved in the huge Wrighster argument. But here is a link I found that shows all the times he has been on the injury report since 2003. The "days out" column is pretty useless but it atleast shows the number of times he was listed.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6440/injuries.html
Look what we have here. Someone who useful information instead of BS lies.
From that link:
| INJURIES | | Nov 26, 2007 | 0 | Knee | | Nov 25, 2007 | 0 | Knee | | Oct 26, 2007 | | Head | | Oct 12, 2007 | | Knee | | Oct 05, 2007 | | Knee | | Dec 13, 2006 | | Shoulder | | Dec 06, 2006 | | Shoulder | | Nov 29, 2006 | | Head | | Nov 22, 2006 | | Shoulder | | Nov 15, 2006 | | Back | | Nov 10, 2006 | | Back | | Dec 21, 2004 | 0 | | | Dec 21, 2004 | 64 | | | Dec 15, 2004 | | Back | | Dec 08, 2004 | | Back | | Dec 01, 2004 | | Back | | Nov 24, 2004 | | Back | | Nov 17, 2004 | | Back | | Nov 10, 2004 | | Back | | Oct 27, 2004 | | Back | | Oct 20, 2004 | | Back | | Oct 13, 2004 | | Back | | Oct 06, 2004 | | Back | | Sep 08, 2004 | | Foot | | Dec 17, 2003 | | Hamstring |
Where is this "nagging injury" that has been keeping Wrighster down? We have last years knee, 2004's back and some midweek rest during the stretch of 2 season.
Sure looks "injury prone" to me!
You guys are all as right as can be.
So, anyone care to answer my, polite as I could be, question:
BJORN TOURAQUE (5/4/2008)
Again, based on what? That he's not Tony Gonzalez? Based on something proven and better that we have?
What am I missing here? In this thread he's been called "aging" at 27 and a "medical reject" with two career injures and it's been said that there are others with equal production on this team.
I see no basis for any of these claims. And he got a 5 year extension in 2006.
Oh wait. People here see the future. Nevermind.
|
| |
|
|