|
| | | 
Last Login: Today @ 1:47 PM
|
| JacksJags (5/10/2008)
A back worth a darn (meaning just about any NFL back which makes a roster) would look good beside/behind Manning. RB won't be a problem with him at QB.I agree. Heck, even any of the Texans backs would probably look decent behind Manning.
|
| |
| | | 
Last Login: Thursday, July 24, 2008 2:20 PM
|
| HURRICANE!!! (5/14/2008)
JacksJags (5/10/2008)
A back worth a darn (meaning just about any NFL back which makes a roster) would look good beside/behind Manning. RB won't be a problem with him at QB.I agree. Heck, even any of the Texans backs would probably look decent behind Manning. Not that it is or isn't true, But that sort of has the "Any QB would look good with the Jag's running game" feel to it. A look back at the RB's behind Manning. Faulk, James, Rhodes (The ones with considerable playing time) Faulk was still great for the Rams, Edge played better last year than the 06 season, Dom just got buried on the bench in Oakland. I still think all of them would be successful in a lot of other systems, I think it has as much if not more to do with the system (Denver, Best example) as it does the QB. ... Oh, Adrian Peterson behind Manning? 2,500 yards? .. Probably not, Manning would throw a hissy if they ran the ball that much, Or would he?  Sam
| Don't play dumb with me, You can't win. |
|
| |
|
|